This is quite a declaration. It seems to be filled with apparent contradictions.
First, what is a pluralist? The Free Dictionary says,
“2. pluralist – a philosopher who believes that no single explanation can account for all the phenomena of nature”
Second, an agnostic is,
1.
a. One who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God.
b. One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism.
2. One who is doubtful or noncommittal about something.
There is a common theme that ties the two terms together. The term “noncommittal” is the key concept.
- The pluralist will not commit to a single cause of nature.
- The agnostic refuses to believe the record which is given concerning the nature of God. Based upon this willful frame of mind, such a person will never be settled and will be inclined to waffle on issue of science and morals.
One who holds to these two positions will likely never know the conclusion of any matter, no matter how much investigation will be done regarding any matter studied. Accomplishing goals will be unlikely, for they will never know if the goal is worthy, intellectually tenable, or achievable. In fact effective goal setting itself becomes a doubtful likelihood.
Before one can accomplish any effort, they must have some reasonable confidence in the objective, process and the end result of that effort. Is it worth the effort? Will I achieve the result I struck out to accomplish? Is it the right thing to do? Will I be able to build on the results?
As to the matter of God, we have many diverse god systems. To say that it is wise to accept a plurality of belief systems comes into question. Each system has its differing standards. A comparison of the systems also teaches that there is a high degree of contradiction between the fundamentals of each system. To say that the contradictions do not exist is to close one’s eyes to reality. It is also very illogical. Even to emphasize the commonness of tenants of belief is lacking in reason. The basis of why these common tenants exist will be different and therefore contradictory. Likewise the purpose of application will widely vary. Pluralism when it comes to religion is not a reasonable thing to claim. Is it really possible to ignore that many if not most claim to be the only true religion?
Agnosticism is the illogical process of those who either fail to make the effort to find the true answer or those who choose to ignore real truth when they do find it. Every person should have well studied this matter and determined truth before they enter into life as an adult. To raise a family with so much uncertainty is to place chaos before one’s heritage. Truth can be known and truth needs to be the guiding foundation for marriage, family, community interactions, and life vocations.
The Bible says that there is no excuse!